18.
[44]
Nor am I now finding fault with your prudence in not giving him those tribes
to which he was best known, but I am proving that the intention of the
senate was disregarded by you. In truth which of all these men would listen
to you? Or what could you say? Could you say that Plancius was guilty of the
depository of the money to be used in bribery? Men's ears would reject the
assertion. No one would endure it. All would turn away from it. That he was
a very acceptable man to the tribes? They would hear that willingly. We
ourselves should not be afraid to allow that. For do not think, O
Laterensis, that the effect of those laws which the senate has thought fit
to establish concerning bribery has been to put an end to the recommendation
of candidates to attentions being paid to electors, or to personal
influence. There have always been virtuous men who have been anxious to have
influence among the men of their own tribe.
[45]
Nor, indeed, has our order ever been so harsh towards the common people,
as to be unwilling to have it courted by moderate liberality on our part.
Nor are our children to be forbidden to pay attention to the men of their
own tribe or to show regard for them or to canvass them on behalf of their
friends, or to expect a similar service from them when they are themselves
candidates for any office. For all these things are only acts of mutual
kindness and politeness, and are sanctioned by ancient customs and
precedent. That was on our conduct when the occasions of our ambition
required it; and such we have seen to be the course of most illustrious men;
and even at the present day we see many men alive to the
necessity of keeping up their interests. It was the dividing the men of a
tribe into decuries, the classification of the whole people, and the attempt
to bind men's votes by bribes, that provoked the severity of the senate, and
the energetic indignation of all good men. Allege this, prove this, direct
your attention to this point, O Laterensis, that Plancius divided the tribes
into decuries, that he classified the people, that he was an agent with whom
money was deposited, that he promised money, that he distributed it; and
then I shall wonder at your not having chosen to use the weapons which the
law has armed you with. For with judges taken from the men of our own tribe,
I need not say we could not if those things were true, bear their severity,
but we could not even look them in the face.
[46]
But, after having avoided this line of conduct, and
declined having those men for judges, who, as they must have had the most
certain knowledge of such conduct, were bound to feel the greatest
indignation at it what will you say before those men who silently ask of you
why you have imposed this burden upon them; why you have chosen them above
all men; why you prefer having them to proceed by guesswork, rather than
those men to decide who had means of knowing the truth?
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

