This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
[19]
For it often
happens, owing to exceptional circumstances, that
what is accustomed under ordinary circumstances to
be considered morally wrong is found not to be
morally wrong. For the sake of illustration, let us
assume some particular case that admits of wider
application: what more atrocious crime can there be
than to kill a fellow-man, and especially an intimate
friend? But if anyone kills a tyrant—be he never
so intimate a friend—he has not laden his soul with
guilt, has he? The Roman People, at all events, are
not of that opinion; for of all glorious deeds they
hold such an one to be the most noble. Has expediency, then, prevailed over moral rectitude? Not at
all; moral rectitude has gone hand in hand with
expediency.
Some general rule, therefore, should be laid down1
to enable us to decide without error, whenever
what we call the expedient seems to clash with what
we feel to be morally right; and, if we follow that
rule in comparing courses of conduct, we shall never
swerve from the path of duty.
1 Need of a rule for guidance.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

