[58]
Why should I mention his country? when in the first place by violence and
arms, and dread of personal danger, he drove away from the city and from all
the protection afforded him by his country that citizen whom you had decided
over and over again to have been the saviour of his country. In the second
place, having overthrown the companion of the senate, as I have always said,
but its leader as he used to call him, he by violence, bloodshed, and
conflagration, threw into confusion the senate itself, the mainstay of the
general safety and of the public good sense; he abolished two laws, the
Aelian and Fufian laws, which were of especial advantage to the state; he
extinguished the censorship; he took away the power of intercession; he
abolished the auspices; he armed
the consuls, the companions of his wickedness, with the treasury, and
provinces, and an army; he sold the kings who were in existence, and he
called men kings who were not so; he drove Cnaeus Pompeius to his house with
violence and arms; he overthrew the monuments of our generals; he threw down
the houses of his enemies; he inscribed his own name on your monuments. The
wicked deeds which have been done by him to the injury of his country are
innumerable. Why need I tell what he has done to individual citizens, whom
he has slain? Why need I count up the allies whom he has plundered? or the
generals whom he has betrayed? or the armies with which he has tampered?
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

