hide Sorting

You can sort these results in two ways:

By entity
Chronological order for dates, alphabetical order for places and people.
By position (current method)
As the entities appear in the document.

You are currently sorting in ascending order. Sort in descending order.

hide Most Frequent Entities

The entities that appear most frequently in this document are shown below.

Entity Max. Freq Min. Freq
Fremont 30 24 Browse Search
United States (United States) 24 0 Browse Search
Floyd 23 1 Browse Search
Rosencranz 21 11 Browse Search
Kanawha (West Virginia, United States) 20 0 Browse Search
Hunter 17 17 Browse Search
G. H. Scott 13 1 Browse Search
Missouri (Missouri, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
Tennessee (Tennessee, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
Maryland (Maryland, United States) 12 0 Browse Search
View all entities in this document...

Browsing named entities in The Daily Dispatch: November 15, 1861., [Electronic resource].

Found 1,016 total hits in 467 results.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ...
Feit (search for this): article 3
Puritan Consistency. --A historian of the Puritans, in writing some twenty-five years ago, remarks that "it is irresistibly amusing to see how the Puritans copied England in bad things, though all the while bitterly abusing her. They ventured a revolution, because taxed without their own consent, but they had nevertheless adopted such a principle as quite right for them." They never hesitated to tax English property, wherever they could, by any pretence, lay their hands on it. Mr. Feit, one of their writers, admits, that as early as 1639, "they ordered persons here, (Salons, Mass.) and throughout the colony," who owned estates in England, to be taxed for them. These persons owning these estates, were not allowed to vote in Puritan councils, nor be so much as freemen, unless they owned the Puritan covenant. Without representation, without a title to so much as the elective franchise, they might be taxed for estates situated under another Government, three thousand miles away, an
Puritan (Ohio, United States) (search for this): article 3
it, one of their writers, admits, that as early as 1639, "they ordered persons here, (Salons, Mass.) and throughout the colony," who owned estates in England, to be taxed for them. These persons owning these estates, were not allowed to vote in Puritan councils, nor be so much as freemen, unless they owned the Puritan covenant. Without representation, without a title to so much as the elective franchise, they might be taxed for estates situated under another Government, three thousand miles aport. Who does not see that their outcry against the taxation of England without representation was miserable pretext, especially when that taxation was looked upon by England as but as equivalent for charter privileges? Another example of Puritan inconsistency in thus referred to by our author. They thought it vast indignity for the English to call us rebels. But so soon us an Indian, after being wheedled into an act of which he knew nothing of the import, a declaration of allegiance
Jefferson Davis (search for this): article 5
prissy there must have been violence used or the employment of some messas to put the captain of the Joseph in fear, and in this case there was no violence or threats proved. He then spoke of the question of variance as to the authority of Jefferson Davis to grant the commission to Captain Buker. He referred to the United States against Harrman in 19th Peters, where the prisoners were indicted for stealing a Treasury note for bearing one percent, interest, but it was found that it was to bear one mill per cent., objection was taken and the Court held that the variance was fatal. So is this case, he (Mr. Brady) contended that the indictment designating the commission as having been issued by one Jefferson Davis, without stating that he claimed to be President of the Confederate States, was a variance, and fatal. If the Government made war on the South, as the defence commands it did, by the acts of Mr. Lincoln, the South had a right to herself — to arm vessels had grant letter
Quincy (search for this): article 5
hat was called the massacre of Massachusetts subjects by British forces. The soldiers, on being indicted, sought for counsel, and they found two men of great eminence in the profession to act for them. One of them was Mr. Adams, and the other Mr. Quincy. The father of Mr. Quincy addressed a letter, imploring him on his allegiance as a son, and from affection and duty towards him, not to undertake the defence of these men. The son wrote back a response, recognizing, as he truly felt, all the Mr. Quincy addressed a letter, imploring him on his allegiance as a son, and from affection and duty towards him, not to undertake the defence of these men. The son wrote back a response, recognizing, as he truly felt, all the which he owed to that honored parent, but at the same time taking the high appropriate ground that he must discharge his duty as an advocate according to the rules of his profession, and to the obligation of his official cath, whatever might be the result of his course.--The struggled is the history of the world, to have, in criminal courts, as honest judiciary, a fearless jury and a faithful advocate, disclose a great deal of wrong and suffering inflicted on advocated alleged by force, tremblin
Peters (search for this): article 5
To convict of prissy there must have been violence used or the employment of some messas to put the captain of the Joseph in fear, and in this case there was no violence or threats proved. He then spoke of the question of variance as to the authority of Jefferson Davis to grant the commission to Captain Buker. He referred to the United States against Harrman in 19th Peters, where the prisoners were indicted for stealing a Treasury note for bearing one percent, interest, but it was found that it was to bear one mill per cent., objection was taken and the Court held that the variance was fatal. So is this case, he (Mr. Brady) contended that the indictment designating the commission as having been issued by one Jefferson Davis, without stating that he claimed to be President of the Confederate States, was a variance, and fatal. If the Government made war on the South, as the defence commands it did, by the acts of Mr. Lincoln, the South had a right to herself — to arm ve
Brady (search for this): article 5
here the prisoners were indicted for stealing a Treasury note for bearing one percent, interest, but it was found that it was to bear one mill per cent., objection was taken and the Court held that the variance was fatal. So is this case, he (Mr. Brady) contended that the indictment designating the commission as having been issued by one Jefferson Davis, without stating that he claimed to be President of the Confederate States, was a variance, and fatal. If the Government made war on the South, as the defence commands it did, by the acts of Mr. Lincoln, the South had a right to herself — to arm vessels had grant letter, of marque, and to oppose force to force. After some further argument Mr. Brady concluded by saying; Gentlemen, I will detain you but a few moments longer. I have endeavored to show, in the first place, that those man cannot be convicted of piracy, because they had not the intent to steal essential to the commission of that offence, and that you are the judges w
Adams (search for this): article 5
there never was a more unfounded rumor — never a more idle tale — and that judicial murders were perpetrated on the face of the earth more intolerable, more inexcusable, more without palliation, than the act to which a refer. How different was it at Boston, at the time of what was called the massacre of Massachusetts subjects by British forces. The soldiers, on being indicted, sought for counsel, and they found two men of great eminence in the profession to act for them. One of them was Mr. Adams, and the other Mr. Quincy. The father of Mr. Quincy addressed a letter, imploring him on his allegiance as a son, and from affection and duty towards him, not to undertake the defence of these men. The son wrote back a response, recognizing, as he truly felt, all the which he owed to that honored parent, but at the same time taking the high appropriate ground that he must discharge his duty as an advocate according to the rules of his profession, and to the obligation of his official cat
Lincoln (search for this): article 5
note for bearing one percent, interest, but it was found that it was to bear one mill per cent., objection was taken and the Court held that the variance was fatal. So is this case, he (Mr. Brady) contended that the indictment designating the commission as having been issued by one Jefferson Davis, without stating that he claimed to be President of the Confederate States, was a variance, and fatal. If the Government made war on the South, as the defence commands it did, by the acts of Mr. Lincoln, the South had a right to herself — to arm vessels had grant letter, of marque, and to oppose force to force. After some further argument Mr. Brady concluded by saying; Gentlemen, I will detain you but a few moments longer. I have endeavored to show, in the first place, that those man cannot be convicted of piracy, because they had not the intent to steal essential to the commission of that offence, and that you are the judges whether that intent did or did not exist. If it did not,
Buker (search for this): article 5
To convict of prissy there must have been violence used or the employment of some messas to put the captain of the Joseph in fear, and in this case there was no violence or threats proved. He then spoke of the question of variance as to the authority of Jefferson Davis to grant the commission to Captain Buker. He referred to the United States against Harrman in 19th Peters, where the prisoners were indicted for stealing a Treasury note for bearing one percent, interest, but it was found that it was to bear one mill per cent., objection was taken and the Court held that the variance was fatal. So is this case, he (Mr. Brady) contended that the indictment designating the commission as having been issued by one Jefferson Davis, without stating that he claimed to be President of the Confederate States, was a variance, and fatal. If the Government made war on the South, as the defence commands it did, by the acts of Mr. Lincoln, the South had a right to herself — to arm v
England (United Kingdom) (search for this): article 5
ance of any such duty. But, gentlemen, it is not our fault. The advocate is of very little use in the days of prosperity and peace — in the periods of reposits, in protecting your property or aiding you to recover your rights of a civil nature. It is only when public opinion, or the strong power of Government, the formidable array of influence, the force of a nation or the fury of a , in directed against you, that the advocated of any use. Many years ago, while we were yet colonies of Great Britain, there occurred on this Island what is known as the famous negro is surrection — the result of an idle story, told by a worthless person, and yet leading to such an inflammation of the public mind that all the lawyers who then practised at the bar of New York and it is the greatest stigma on our profession of which the world can furnish an example, refused to defend the accused parties. One of them was a poor priest of. I believe, foreign origin. The consequence was that numerous convi
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ...