hide
Named Entity Searches
hide
Matching Documents
The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.
| Document | Max. Freq | Min. Freq | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 7. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) | 10 | 2 | Browse | Search |
| D. H. Hill, Jr., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 4, North Carolina (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) | 3 | 1 | Browse | Search |
| Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 23. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) | 2 | 0 | Browse | Search |
| Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 27. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) | 2 | 2 | Browse | Search |
| The Daily Dispatch: January 27, 1862., [Electronic resource] | 2 | 0 | Browse | Search |
| Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 15. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) | 1 | 1 | Browse | Search |
| View all matching documents... | ||||
Your search returned 20 results in 8 document sections:
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 7. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), A Correction of Dr. McKim 's paper. (search)
A Correction of Dr. McKim's paper. By Colonel J. R. Winston.
It seems almost impossible to get the facts of battles.
Writers of the very highest standing make different statements about the same transaction.
Rev. Dr. McKim, in sketch of Steuart's brigade on third day at Gettysburg, says (Southern Historical Society Papers, June, 1878, pages 298-9): Daniel's brigade remained in the breastworks during and after the charge, and neither from that command nor from any other had we any support.
Now, I know that Daniel's brigade went into the fight on General Steuart's line; as we went in I passed General Steuart, and as I came out (badly wounded) I again passed him. Hestopped me and talked with me about my wounds.
A portion of Daniel's brigade — some of the Forty-fifth North Carolina regiment--never did get behind breastworks, although they were exposed to two lines of works of the enemy.
I can bear fullest testimony to the gallantry of General Steuart and his brave regiments of
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 7. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), Colonel Winston 's Correction corrected. (search)
Colonel Winston's Correction corrected. By Rev. Dr. R. H. Mckim.
The February number of these Papers (page 94) contains a communication from Colonel J. R. Winston, calling in question the accurColonel J. R. Winston, calling in question the accuracy of certain statements made by me in my narrative of Steuart's brigade at Gettysburg.
Allow me first to assure my critic that I have been unfortunate in conveying my meaning if anything I have left the Federal works to make the charge.
So much for my animus. Now, as to the facts.
Colonel Winston questions the statement that Daniel's command remained in the breastworks during and after ne of works which Steuart vacated in order to make the charge.
The incident referred to by Colonel Winston must have occurred at some other time.
I was not wounded (though struck four times), assis s in the charge, and know whereof I affirm.
It was the last charge made, and it is certain Colonel Winston did not pass General Steuart during that charge. I can assure him there was no time for exc
D. H. Hill, Jr., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 4, North Carolina (ed. Clement Anselm Evans), Chapter 11 : (search)
D. H. Hill, Jr., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 4, North Carolina (ed. Clement Anselm Evans), Chapter 17 : (search)
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 15. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), Index. (search)
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 23. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), The Longstreet -Gettysburg controversy [from the Richmond (Va.) Dispatch, February 16 , 1896 .] (search)
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 27. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), The surrender at Appomattox . (search)