Your search returned 20 results in 10 document sections:

; projected trip to Texas, 105, 322; publishes Nat. Enquirer, 105, 323, retires, 323, approves Clerical Appeal, 322; loss by burning of Penn. Hall, 217; alienation from G., 322, death, 321; Life written by T. Earle, 323, and sketch by G., 324; resolutions Mass. A. S. S., 324, 335.— Letters to G., 1.99, 193; from A. Tappan, 1.190, G., 1.196. Son of Lundy, Joseph, 2.323. Lunt, George [1803-1885], State senator of Mass., 2.95; bullies abolitionists at a hearing, 97, report, 104, 105. Lushington, Stephen [1782-1873], signs protests against Colon. Soc., 1.361; at Wilberforce's funeral, 379; urges Thompson to the law, 436. Luther, Martin, cited by G., 1.507, Sabbath views, 2.10; harsh language like G.'s, 122. Lyman, Theodore, jr., Gen., career, 1.495; opposes Missouri compromise, 2.80; charity, 54; calls public meeting over Ursuline Convent outrage, 33; presides at Faneuil Hall meeting, 1.495, 500, 503, 2.31, 33; advises against A. S. meetings, 5; disperses Thompson mob, 7; a
Wendell Phillips, Theodore C. Pease, Speeches, Lectures and Letters of Wendell Phillips: Volume 2, Kossuth (1851). (search)
. The freedom of twelve millions bought the silence of Louis Kossuth for a year. A world in the scale never bought the silence of O'Connell or Fayette for a moment. That is just the difference between him and them. O'Connell (I was told the anecdote by Sir Thomas Fowell Buxton), in 1859, after his election to the House of Commons, was called upon by the West India interest — some fifty or sixty strong — who said, O'Connell, you have been accustomed to act with Clarkson and Wilberforce, Lushington and Brougham, to speak on the platform of Freemasons' Hall, and advocate what is called the abolition cause. Mark this! If you will break loose from these associates, if you will close your mouth on the slave question, you may reckon on our undivided support on Irish matters. Whenever your country's claims come up, you shall be sure of fifty votes on your side. No! said O'Connell; let God care for Ireland; I will never shut my mouth on the slave question to save her! [Loud cheers.] H
Wendell Phillips, Theodore C. Pease, Speeches, Lectures and Letters of Wendell Phillips: Volume 2, Daniel O'Connell (1875.) (search)
ples, I asked Sir Thomas Fowell Buxton, a Tory, Is O'Connell an honest man? As honest a man as ever breathed, said he, and then told me this story: When, in 1830, O'Connell entered Parliament, the Antislavery cause was so weak that it had only Lushington and myself to speak for it; and we agreed that when he spoke I should cheer him, and when I spoke he should cheer me; and these were the only cheers we ever got. O'Connell came, with one Irish member to support him. A large number of members [In, God knows I speak for the saddest people the sun sees; but may my right hand forget its cunning, and my tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth, if to save Ireland, even Ireland, I forget the negro one single hour! From that day, said Buxton, Lushington and I never went into the lobby that O'Connell did not follow us. Some years afterwards I went into Conciliation Hall where O'Connell was arguing for repeal. He lifted from the table a thousand-pound note sent them from New Orleans, and sai
ties, In this respect, the letter is worthy to be consulted along with Weld's Slavery as it is and Mrs. Stowe's Key to Uncle Tom's Cabin. and his subserviency to slavery with the attitude of Thompson, O'Connell, O'Connell (I was told the anecdote by Sir Thomas Fowell Buxton), in 1829, after his election to the House of Commons, was called upon by the West India interest, some fifty or sixty strong, who said, O'Connell, you have been accustomed to act with Clarkson and Wilberforce, Lushington and Brougham, to speak on the platform of Freemasons' Hall and advocate what is called the abolition cause. Mark this! If you will break loose from these associates, if you will close your mouth on the slave question, you may reckon on our undivided support on Irish matters. Whenever your country's claims come up, you shall be sure of fifty votes on your side. No, said O'Connell, let God care for Ireland; I will never shut my mouth on the slave question to save her! (Wendell Philli
Francis Jackson Garrison, William Lloyd Garrison, 1805-1879; the story of his life told by his children: volume 4, Chapter 2: the hour and the man.—1862. (search)
ent of that work, and the enormous advantage which thereby accrued to the American cause. All the anti-slavery people, with here and there an exception, support the North; while the representatives of the old West India interests and the Conservative party generally remain true to their dishonorable traditions. . . . It has been the fashion of the Times to taunt the Emancipation Society with being deserted by all the old, well-remembered names. This is true of Lord Brougham, but not of Dr. Lushington. Several of the Buxtons, the Gurneys, the Croppers, and the Hughes have avowed their sympathy with the Northern cause; and . . . Mr. Henry Wilberforce, the younger son of the great philanthropist, is most earnest in his advocacy of sound views on the American question, and feels deeply the dishonor which some of his countrymen have put upon themselves by their pro-Southern sentiments (F. W. Chesson to W. L. G., Feb. 18, 1865, Lib. 35: 46). But without the Proclamation of Emancipation to
Edward L. Pierce, Memoir and letters of Charles Sumner: volume 3, Chapter 41: search for health.—journey to Europe.—continued disability.—1857-1858. (search)
visit. He was warmly received by Lansdowne, Brougham, Cranworth (now lord chancellor), Wensleydale (Baron Parke), and Lushington,—all friends of his youth. The Earl of Carlisle promptly welcomed him to the vice-regal lodge at Dublin. the Duke and recalled him as an affable and courteous guest. He made from London brief visits to the Sutherlands at Cliveden, to Dr. Lushington at Ockham Park, to T. Baring at Norman Court, to the Earl of Stanhope at Chevening, to the Archbishop of Canterbury augham, and met a most distinguished company,— the Lord Chancellor, Lord Campbell, Lord Chief Justice of Common Pleas, Dr. Lushington, Lord Clanricarde, Lord Shaftesbury, Lord Aberdeen, Lord Broughton, Lord Glenelg, Duke of Wellington, Bishop of Oxfort Lord Belper's, where I met for the first time Macaulay, so altered I did not know him. July 12. Sunday. Went to Dr. Lushington's, at Ockham Park in Surrey, the old seat of Lord Chancellor King; among the guests there was Lady Trevelyan, a most
Edward L. Pierce, Memoir and letters of Charles Sumner: volume 3, chapter 14 (search)
ngland,—thanks to that generous hospitality of which I have enjoyed so much. Here it is: Seven days in London at the British Museum; a day with the poet-laureate Tennyson at the Isle of Wight; The Duchess of Argyll wrote, July 23, 1863: Tennyson always remembers your visit with pleasure. two days with Lord Stanhope at Chevening Park, where I slept in the room which was occupied for three years by Lord Chatham; one day at Argyll Lodge with the duke, where I met Gladstone; one day with Dr. Lushington at Ockham Park in Surrey; one day with my countryman Motley, the historian of the Dutch commonwealth, at Walton-on-Thames; one day with Lord Clarendon at the Grove; one day with Lord Spencer Born in 1835; twice lord lieutenant of Ireland. Soon after returning home, Sumner sent Lord Spencer a quantity of blue-grass seed to be sown on his estate. From Althorp he visited Brington, the ancestral home of the Washingtons; and a year later he received from the earl copies of the Washington
George Ticknor, Life, letters and journals of George Ticknor (ed. George Hillard), Chapter 4: (search)
lso a member of the convent . . . . A tasteful breakfast and collation was prepared in the room of the Superior; those who chose went over the convent, and saw the room of the new nun, which was prettily and comfortably fitted up, and the whole affair was ended. . . . . In the evening Mr. Elphinstone made us a visit, and stayed quite late. He is one of the most agreeable old gentlemen I have ever known, and full of knowledge and experience of life. He is the person under whose care Mrs. Lushington made that overland journey from India to England about which she has made so pleasant a little book. He was then returning from Bombay, where he had been governor. . . . . . He goes now to England in a day or two, and I am sorry for it . . . . . The Trevelyans, too, passed the evening with us. February 15.—This evening Mr. Kestner, the Hanoverian Minister, came to see us, and brought with him a portfolio, containing about an hundred letters from Goethe to Mr. Kestner's father and mo
George Ticknor, Life, letters and journals of George Ticknor (ed. George Hillard), chapter 30 (search)
hn Graham, II. 152. Louis Philippe, King of the French, II. 16, 19, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 121, 122, 135. Louvois, Marchioness de, I. 253. Lovell, Mrs., I. 286, II. 166. Lovering, Professor J., II. 310. Lowe, Rev Mr., I. 440, 441, 445. Lowe, Right Hon Robert, II. 380. Lowell, John, I. 389, 356, 360 Lowenstein—Wertheim, Princess, I. 487, 489 Lubbock, Sir, John, II. 179. Lucca, visits, II. 94, 95 Ludolf, Count, II. 69 and note, 70, 79, 80. Lund, I. 177. Lushington, Mrs., II 72. Luttichau, M. de., I. 476 and note, 491. Luttichau, Madame Ida de, I. 476, 481, 482, 483, 485, 491, 11. 334. Lutzow, Count, II. 76, 342. Lutzow, Countess, II. 76. Luxmoore, Misses, I. 432 note, II. 178 and note. Lyell, Charles (Sir Charles), II. 176, 197, 203, 219, 223, 224, 244 note, 269 note, 294, 313, 329, 357, 358, 359, 363, 364, 365, 367, 369, 370, 429, 437; letters to, 215, 216, 230, 234, 240, 253, 271, 273, 276, 287, 296, 407, 422, 430, 446, 460. Lyell, C
James Russell Soley, Professor U. S. Navy, Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 7.1, The blockade and the cruisers (ed. Clement Anselm Evans), Chapter 7: (search)
to send them in, is no new thing in maritime warfare, especially in the maritime warfare of the United States. The cruise of the Argus in 1813 was precisely parallel to those of the Alabama and Florida; and the instructions of the Navy Department to commanding officers during the war of 1812 were to destroy all you capture, unless in some extraordinary cases that clearly warrant an exception. To take a later instance, in a decision in the High Court of Admiralty during the Crimean War, Dr. Lushington said, It may be justifiable, or even praiseworthy in the captors to destroy an enemy's vessel. Indeed, the bringing into adjudication at all of an enemy's vessel is not called for by any respect to the rights of the enemy proprietor, where there is no neutral property on board. The French, in at least two cases in the war of 1870, burned prizes at sea, because it was inconvenient to send prize crews on board; and from more recent events it is clear that other Governments, in case of wa