hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 10. (ed. Frank Moore) 286 0 Browse Search
D. H. Hill, Jr., Confederate Military History, a library of Confederate States Military History: Volume 4, North Carolina (ed. Clement Anselm Evans) 136 6 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 8. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 124 10 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 9. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 117 9 Browse Search
John M. Schofield, Forty-six years in the Army 95 1 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 18. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 78 8 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 9. (ed. Frank Moore) 76 0 Browse Search
Comte de Paris, History of the Civil War in America. Vol. 3. (ed. Henry Coppee , LL.D.) 57 3 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 19. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 52 4 Browse Search
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 4. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones) 49 1 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 19. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones). You can also browse the collection for James H. Lane or search for James H. Lane in all documents.

Your search returned 28 results in 4 document sections:

Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 19. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), The artillery defenders of Fort Gregg. (search)
n Historical Society Papers (XVIII) sent me several communications from General James H. Lane in reference to the actions of his brigade on different fields and and nd again the credit of the artillery is given to Chew's Maryland battery. General Lane in a letter to you dated September 17, 1890, writes (Southern Historical Mage, Volume XVIII, page 80): The true defenders at Fort Gregg were a part of Lane's North Carolina brigade, Walker's supernumerary artillerists of A. P. Hill's coanother work, called Fort Whitworth (not Alexander, as erroneously called by General Lane). These two forts—or, as they really were, simple earthworks—were to have becannoneers, and to the right and left, along the entrenchments, were infantry of Lane's and Thomas's commands, I believe, stationed several yards apart. As we walke. For many years—a quarter of a century—it has been claimed by Pollard and General Lane that Chew's battery participated in the defence of Gregg. It is full time
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 19. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), chapter 1.15 (search)
ook's and McRae's brigades, of Heth's division; Lane's, Scales and McGowan's brigades, of Wilcox's dernoon by the three North Carolina brigades of Lane, Cooke and McRae, from left to right, in the orneral Conner, of South Carolina, was commanding Lane's brigade, as General Lane had been severely woGeneral Lane had been severely wounded at Cold Harbor. Where is the North Carolinian who does not rejoice in the unfading laurels of John R. Cooke and James H. Lane, who, though natives of another State, are as dear to us as our as already been sketched to-day. In front of Lane and Cooke the enemy had felled trees, sharpeninabattis, which was exceedingly formidable where Lane's men had to pass, they were ordered to advanceble resistance after their works were reached. Lane's and Cooke's men, stimulated by the shouts of erate loss was small, and fell principally upon Lane's brigade. In the second and final assault it . The brigades of Generals Cooke, McRae and Lane, the last under the temporary command of Genera[5 more...]
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 19. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), chapter 1.23 (search)
bear the idea of having even an enemy unnecessarily exposed. Breaking camp at Castleman's Ferry, in November, we moved up the Valley, crossed the Blue Ridge by the turnpike from Newmarket to Gordonsville, and marched toward Fredericksburg, which we reached (or the vicinity of it) about December 1, 1862. At this time I was relieved of duty by the return of Major Hill, and went back to my brigade, which had lost its beloved Branch at Sharpsburg, and was now under command of Brigadier-General James H. Lane, who had earned his promotion while in command of the Twenty-eighth North Carolina, one of the regiments of that hard-fought brigade. Closing incidents. The battle of Fredericksburg passed and so did the winter, when the spring-time called us to Chancellorsville, the sad scene of the wounding of Stonewall Jackson. General Hill was wounded near the same spot and about the same time. He was not in command for a day or so, but was an interested spectator of that heated enga
Southern Historical Society Papers, Volume 19. (ed. Reverend J. William Jones), The First North Carolina Volunteers and the battle of Bethel. (search)
H. Hill, thirteen; Major Stokes, two; scattering, four. For Major. James H. Lane received six hundred and ten votes; Mr. Lovejoy, eighty-three; scattering, and will take the same position in the regiment occupied by that company. Major Lane is detached as mustering officer, to muster into the service of the State thea Regiment Volunteers. Lieutenant-Colonel C. C. Lee was elected colonel; Major James H. Lane, lieutenant-colonel, Lieutenant-Colonel Lane was soon after unanimousLieutenant-Colonel Lane was soon after unanimously and unexpectedly to himself elected colonel of the Twenty-eighth North Carolina Infantry. Upon severing his honored connection with the First Regiment, its offic. and Lieutenant R. F. Hoke, of Company K, major, with singular unanimity. Major Lane received a complimentary vote for colonel, and was elected lieutenant-colonel developed a great deal of fine talent, and in no man more than in Lieutenant-Colonel James H. Lane. Camp Fayetteville is about six miles below Yorktown, named in