hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
George Bancroft, History of the Colonization of the United States, Vol. 1, 17th edition. 26 0 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in George Bancroft, History of the Colonization of the United States, Vol. 1, 17th edition.. You can also browse the collection for M. H. Coll or search for M. H. Coll in all documents.

Your search returned 13 results in 2 document sections:

George Bancroft, History of the Colonization of the United States, Vol. 1, 17th edition., Chapter 8: (search)
ce's N. E. Chronology, 113,114. u. Mass. Hist. Coll. IX. 3, 4. which Nov 10 Popham, the chief justmouth company. See Smith, in III. Mass. Hist. Coll. III. 19; and in his Historie, II. 175, 176; Pu map of the coast, Map, in III. Mass. Hist. Coll. III. and named the country New England,—a titrton. Prince, 132. Mourt's Relation, in i. M. H. Coll. VIII. 238. Plantation of N. England, in II. Mass. Hist. Coll. IX. 6, 7. Encouraged by commercial success, Smith next 1615. endeavored, i the Westerlings, Ibid. in III. Mass. Hist. Coll. III. 21. Hubbard, 84, 85. Gorges. Purchas, Ived to comprise, Smith, in III. Mass. Hist. Coll. III. 31, estimates the land at one million onerican fisheries. Smith, in III. Mass. Hist. Coll. III. 32. Smith, II. 263. The re suits which g before, had appropriated. III. Mass. Hist. Coll. III. 20. The patent was designed to hasten plahts of a powerful company. III. Mass. Hist. Coll. III. 32. Smith, II. 263. While the English mo[1 more...]
George Bancroft, History of the Colonization of the United States, Vol. 1, 17th edition., Chapter 9: (search)
nt. The original authorities,—Debates of the Commons, 1620—1, i. 258. 260, 261. 318, 319; Journal of Commons, in Chalmers, 100—102, and 103, 104; Sir F. Gorges' Narration, Morrell, in i. Mass Hist. Coll. i. 125—139; Smith, in III. Mass. Hist. Coll. III. 25; Hazard, i. 151—155. Compare Prince, Morton, Hutchinson, Belknap, and Chalmers. The determined opposition of the house, though it could not move the king to overthrow the corporation, paralyzed its enterprise; many of the patentees af Richelieu succeeded in obtaining the restitution, 1632 Mar. 29. not of Canada only, but of Cape Breton and undefined Acadia. Charlevoix, i. 176. Winthrop, i. 13. Hazard, i. 319, 320. Williamson, i. 246, 247. Dummer's Memorial, in III. M. H. Coll. i. 232, is an ex parte statement, unworthy to be cited as of authority. The event has been frequently deplored; but misery ensued, because neither the boundaries of the rival nations were distinctly marked, nor the spirit of the compact ho