Browsing named entities in George Bancroft, History of the Colonization of the United States, Vol. 1, 17th edition.. You can also browse the collection for Beverley or search for Beverley in all documents.

Your search returned 7 results in 2 document sections:

George Bancroft, History of the Colonization of the United States, Vol. 1, 17th edition., Chapter 5: (search)
re-arms except against a deer or a fowl. Confidence so far increased, that the old law, which made death the penalty for teaching the Indians to use a musket, was forgotten; and they were now employed as fowlers and huntsmen. Ibid. II. 103. Beverley, 38. The plantations of the English were widely extended, in unsuspecting confidence, along the James River and towards the Potomac, wherever rich grounds invited to the culture of tobacco; Beverley, 38. Burk, i 231, 232. nor were solitary pBeverley, 38. Burk, i 231, 232. nor were solitary places, remote from neighbors, avoided, since there would there be less competition for the ownership of the soil. Powhatan, the father of Pocahontas, remained, after the marriage of his daughter, the firm friend of the English. He died in 1618; and his younger brother was now the heir to his influence. Should the native occupants of the soil consent to be driven from their ancient patrimony? Should their feebleness submit patiently to contempt, injury, and the loss of their lands? The des
George Bancroft, History of the Colonization of the United States, Vol. 1, 17th edition., Chapter VI (search)
would hardly have been much disturbed because fines were exacted with too relentless rigor; Beverley, 48. Bullock, 10. but the whole colony of Virginia was in a state of excitement and alarm in cs accusers. Hening, i. 223, and 4. Oldmixon, i 240. Oldmixon is unworthy of implicit trust Beverley, 18, is not accurate. Campbell's Virginia, 60—a modest little book. Chalmers, 118, 119, is berprise. On the eighteenth day of April, The reader is cautioned against the inaccuracies of Beverley, Oldmixon, and, on this subject, of Burk. See Winthrop's Journal, II. 165. Compare the note oo,&c. Clarendon, Strong, Langford, the public acts, Ludlow, all contemporary, do not disagree. Beverley wrote in the next century; and his account is, therefore, less to be relied on. Besides, it is ded the colony, and have represented that discontent as heightened by commercial oppression. Beverley, Chalmers, Robertson, Marshall. Even the accurate and learned Holmes has transmitted the error