hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
The Daily Dispatch: February 13, 1862., [Electronic resource] 26 0 Browse Search
The Daily Dispatch: February 14, 1862., [Electronic resource] 3 1 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Your search returned 29 results in 2 document sections:

Commonwealth as Job Adkins. --The above defendant, well known as the author of a book on mininr watch, worth $10. Turner told the Mayor that Adkins had met him, knocked him down, and took the prpicious were excited. That at the time he and Adkins, who roomed with him whenever in town, were toht hold of him by the collar of his coat, when Adkins struck him in the mouth, drawing blood. The ales S. Mills testified that he had appointed Mr. Adkins agent of the Midlothian Coal Company; the trhe had unbounded confidence in his integrity. Adkins, besides being honest, was, in his opinion, anied that at any time within the last ten years Adkins could have gotten from his friends all the mon the case was continued until to-morrow, and Mr. Adkins admitted to bail in $500 for his appearance ave on his lip just such a scar as he admitted Adkins gave him on the night of the 1st of June, unde that it is to come up again. In justice to Mr. Adkins we may say, that however honest his accuser [3 more...]
The Daily Dispatch: February 14, 1862., [Electronic resource], Address from a South Carolina (?) lady at Albany in Denunciation of the South. (search)
Honorably Acquitted. --The Mayor yesterday resumed the examination of the complaint made by Edward Turner against Mr. Job Adkins, of knocking him down and taking from his person two watches, on the 1st of June, 1861. Some additional testimony was adduced, but none that could be deemed specially relevant to the question at issue.--Turner, at the conclusion of the evidence, read from notes the heads of an argument he had prepared against Mr. A., which the Mayor listened to with exemplary pance alleged against him, made it his duty to acquit him honorably of the implication sought to be cast on him. He did not question that T. lost his watches, but there was no proof that the party accused took them. With those who have known Mr. Adkins long and intimately, no enology of that gentleman is needed; and with those who do not, if they have read the proceedings in this case, his reputation as an honorable man can suffer no detriment. The whole affair proves that the best of men ar