hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing) 1 1 Browse Search
Thomas Wentworth Higginson, Olde Cambridge 1 1 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Your search returned 2 results in 2 document sections:

Harper's Encyclopedia of United States History (ed. Benson Lossing), Treaties. (search)
of neutrals at seaNaplesJan. 13, 1855 Convention of Peace, friendship, commerce, etc.NaplesOct. 1, 1855 Foreign Power and Object of Treaty.Where Concluded.Date. United Mexican States: Treaty of LimitsMexicoJan. 12, 1828 Treaty of Amity, commerce, navigationMexicoApril 5, 1831 Venezuela: Treaty of Peace, friendship, navigation, commerceCaracasJan. 20, 1836 Convention of Satisfying Aves Island claimsValenciaJan. 14, 1859 Treaty of Amity, commerce, navigation, extraditionCaracasAug. 27, 1860 Convention of Referring claimsCaracasApril 25, 1866 Wurtemberg: Convention of Abolishing droit d'aubaine and taxes on emigrationBerlinApril 10, 1844 Treaty of NaturalizationStuttgartJuly 27, 1868 Zanzibar: Convention of Enlarging treaty with Muscat, 1833ZanzibarJuly 3, 1886 General conventions. Convention with Belgium, Brazil, Dominican Republic, France, Great Britain, Guatemala, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Salvador, Servia, Spain, Sweden, Swiss Confederation, and
Thomas Wentworth Higginson, Olde Cambridge, Chapter 5: Lowell (search)
hat I am always glad of an article from you. I can't use it however before September. I have to make it a rule not to acknowledge articles sent to me — or I should have time for nothing else. You can conceive. Celia Thaxter's poem I like and will print. I think we ought to notice Parker and should like to have your article. I think that folks have confounded (as they commonly do) force with power in estimating him and so have overrated him. Cordially yours, J. R. L. Cambridge, August 27, 1860. My dear Higginson, Your article on Parker is by this time in type for the October number. I should have printed it before had I known that it was in my possession. As ill-luck would have it, it was the bottom one of a bundle of Mss. which I was working down through with no notion that it contained anything but anonymous matter. I wondered you had not sent it, . . . I like your Parker very much — though I question the epithet noble frankness which you apply to his treatment of