[p. 151] “of everything that pains,” but “of everything that is painful” ; for it is the removal of pain, he explains, that should be indicated, not of that which causes pain. In bringing this charge against Epicurus Plutarch is “word-chasing” with excessive minuteness and almost with frigidity; for far from hunting up such verbal meticulousness and such refinements of diction, Epicurus hunts them down. 1
X
[10arg] The meaning of favisae Capitolinae; and what Marcus Varro replied to Servius Sulpicius, who asked him about that term.SERVIUS SULPICIUS, an authority on civil law and a man well versed in letters, wrote 2 to Marcus Varro and asked him to explain the meaning of a term which was used in the records of the censors; the term in question was favisae Capitolinae. Varro wrote in reply 3 that he recalled that Quintus Catulus, when in charge of the restoration of the Capitol, 4 had said that it had been his desire to lower the area Capitolina, 5 in order that the ascent to the temple might have more steps and that the podium might be higher, to correspond with the elevation and size of the pediment 6 ; but that he had been unable to carry out his plan because the favisae had prevented. These, he said, were certain underground chambers and cisterns in the area, in which
